Why Recruiting as AN3, ASO3, or VP3/4 Is Risky—And Why 2025-2027 Makes It Worse
You’ve put in the years—closed deals, pulled all-nighters, proven yourself. Now you’re in your promotion year and thinking about making a move. Maybe you want a better platform, the culture is toxic, or you’re simply ready for something new.
Here’s the uncomfortable truth: recruiting during a promotion year is one of the riskiest career moves in investment banking. And in the current environment—with MD rosters bloated from an 18-month hiring spree and promotion pipelines frozen through 2027—that risk has never been higher.
The Fundamental Problems with Promotion Year Recruiting
The Red Flag Problem
When you interview while sitting in your promotion year, every interviewer wonders: “Why are they leaving right before getting promoted?” The explanations aren’t flattering—you’re not performing well enough, you’ve been told you won’t be promoted, or something is wrong that your current bank has identified.
Your current employer has watched you work for years, seen you handle live deals, and evaluated your client interactions. If they haven’t promoted you yet, that absence of validation speaks volumes to hiring banks.
“Most banks will view being passed up for promotion as a red flag. It’s also difficult for banks to hire an associate that has an expectation to be promoted within the first 12 months on the job.”
The Clock Reset Risk
Many candidates don’t realize that lateral moves often reset your promotion clock. Most laterals do a third year even if performing well—banks want you to go through their training before promoting you. If you’re an Associate 3 hoping to lateral as VP, you may come in as Associate 3 again, adding a year to your trajectory.
Promotions are based on experience—deals closed—not time served. If you haven’t closed enough transactions, you may be asked to repeat a year at a new firm regardless of your tenure.
The Narrative Challenge
“Why do you want to leave?” is often the first question in lateral interviews. During a promotion year, every answer raises follow-ups:
- “I want a better platform” → “Why not get promoted first, then move with more leverage?”
- “The culture isn’t right” → “Did you just realize this, or is it cover for not getting promoted?”
There’s no clean answer. Every response invites skepticism about whether you’re leaving by choice or necessity.
Why 2025-2027 Is Uniquely Brutal
The challenges above are evergreen. But the current landscape has added compounding factors that make this period particularly treacherous.
The MD Hiring Spree and Cascading Freeze
Investment banks spent 18 months aggressively recruiting Managing Directors. JPMorgan added over 100 senior bankers; Jefferies hired 111 MDs since early 2024. Most arrived with two-year guaranteed compensation packages, creating extended periods where performance evaluation is suspended.
At Jefferies, 25% of MDs are now in their first year. At JPMorgan, 100 new senior bankers represent an 11% increase to their 900-MD base. With most protected through 2026-2027, banks have limited capacity to promote from within.
When a bank adds 100 external MDs, those positions don’t exist in addition to normal promotion slots—they occupy them. Directors can’t move to MD, so firms won’t promote VPs to Director. VPs can’t advance, so Associate promotions slow. The bottleneck cascades through the entire pyramid.
The Retracking Nightmare
Directors who left—voluntarily or through restructurings—are discovering the external market can’t absorb them all. PE roles are limited, corporate development can’t accommodate the volume, and middle-market firms can only hire so many.
Faced with limited options, some are returning to banking at reduced levels. Directors are offering to come back as Vice Presidents at VP compensation—accepting lower titles and significantly reduced pay to get back in the game.
For banks, this looks like a bargain: Director-level experience at Associate-level cost. But for VPs on normal trajectories, it’s devastating. You’re no longer competing against peers—you’re competing against more experienced bankers with better relationships who cost the bank the same amount.
How Each Level Gets Squeezed
Vice Presidents face the most complex situation: blocked from Director because Directors can’t move to MD, competing with retracked Directors willing to work at VP pay, and too senior to easily restart elsewhere but not senior enough to be portable. They’re at the stage where Director promotion should be the natural next step—and that transition is now blocked indefinitely.
Associates are reconsidering their commitments. If reaching VP no longer provides reasonable probability of advancement—and may mean competing with retracked Directors at the same pay—the traditional path loses appeal.
Analysts see the entire ladder disrupted, affecting decisions about staying for Associate promotions versus pursuing business school earlier.
The Decision Framework
The Critical Diagnostic
Before making any moves, ask your manager: “Is my promotion a matter of ‘when’ rather than ‘if’?”
If “when, not if”: You’re dealing with a timing issue, likely structural. Stay if you can—the title will come, and you’ll have more leverage afterward.
If “if”: You may need to develop further, or this isn’t the right fit. Either way, recruiting for a promotion elsewhere is unlikely to work—if your current employer won’t promote you, lateral firms won’t either.
The Decision Tree
If you haven’t been passed over yet: Wait for the decision before recruiting. You’ll have more leverage with the title and avoid the “why leaving before promotion” question.
If passed over due to structural factors (headcount freeze, MD blockage, full class ahead): You CAN recruit, but craft a clear narrative explaining the structural issues. Target firms with better pipelines—middle-market firms that maintained internal development. Expect to possibly repeat a year.
If passed over for performance reasons: Don’t recruit for a promotion. It’s unrealistic to expect a lateral firm to promote you in this market. Focus on skill-building, concrete feedback, and whether banking is the right long-term fit.
Early vs. Senior Career Distinction
Not all pass-overs signal the same thing. Being passed over for Associate → VP is often viewed as more concerning—the criteria should be clear at this stage. Being passed over for VP → Director or Director → MD may be more attributable to structural factors, politics, or origination expectations beyond your control.
That said, in the current environment, even early-career pass-overs may be structural. Some top analysts do three full years simply due to a full associate class ahead of them.
The Timeline for Normalization
2025-2026: Constrained promotions at multiple levels. VPs face competition from retracking Directors. Associate-to-VP promotions slow as banks favor experienced talent at bargain prices.
Late 2026: Some capacity reopens as earliest guarantees expire. Selective MD promotions create limited room for advancement, but retracking continues.
2027: More systematic normalization. Director-to-MD and VP-to-Director promotions increase, though still affected by retracking.
2028: Return to typical patterns, though banks deal with gaps from talent losses during 2025-2027.
What You Should Do
- Get the Diagnostic: Have an honest conversation with your supervisor. Understand whether promotion is “when” or “if.”
- Self-Assess Honestly: Reflect on who else was promoted. Compare qualifications and performance. Are you in the right place?
- Build Skills Regardless: Use this time to expand expertise and close more transactions. The experience serves you whether you stay or go.
- Network Strategically: Connect with peers and alumni. Keep options open without broadcasting that you’re looking.
- Don’t Make Impulsive Moves: Explore opportunities patiently and thoughtfully. Continue performing well—your reputation precedes you.
- Consider Adjacent Paths: If banking no longer seems right, explore PE, corporate development, or strategic finance where dynamics may differ.
The current environment combines unusual elements: substantial lateral hiring, two-year guarantee rigidity, cascading constraints through multiple levels, and retracking where experienced professionals accept reduced compensation to reenter. These individually rational decisions have created dynamics that strain the entire system.
The traditional career narrative—work hard, execute well, advance steadily—becomes less reliable when external factors can disrupt progression at any level. If banks prefer hiring former Directors as VPs over promoting existing VPs, what incentive remains to stay and develop?
Your worth isn’t tied to a title or one promotion decision. Keep building skills, growing your network, and pursuing opportunities aligned with your long-term goals. Whether you stay or go, base your choice on career aspirations and industry realities—not frustration or false expectations about what the lateral market can offer.
The promotion pipeline will normalize. The question is whether you’ll be positioned to benefit when it does.
—
This analysis reflects current market conditions. Individual circumstances vary. For personalized guidance, consider working with experienced career advisors.