Before You Sign: How to Judge a Bank’s Real Workload, and the Hours Policies Behind It

by | Oct 7, 2026 | Interviewing, Lateral Recruiting | 0 comments

Exhausted office worker asleep at desk beside financial charts

Wall Street is having a big year, and busy desks need people. New York City securities employment reached 207,400 in 2025, the highest level since 2000, and preliminary data show about 5,300 more jobs added so far in 2026. JPMorgan alone has hired more than 1,000 bankers globally this year. For analysts, associates and lateral candidates, that means more offers to weigh, and more of them arriving with talk about wellbeing, protected weekends and hours caps.

Those policies are real, and some are a clear step forward. But a policy tells you what a bank intends. It does not tell you what a particular group, on a particular deal, with a particular staffing model, will ask of you on a Tuesday night in November. That gap is where most offer regret comes from, and it is the part candidates almost never ask about.

This is a recruiter’s guide to closing that gap: what the formal rules say, what actually drives hours, how it differs by level and by type of firm, and the questions and checks that tell you what you are signing up for.

What the Rules Say Now

The current wave of hours policies dates to 2024, when the death of a young Bank of America banker who had been working very long hours on a large deal put junior workloads back in the headlines (a coroner did not establish a link between the two). Banks responded with a mix of caps, protected time and tracking.

  • JPMorgan introduced an 80-hour weekly cap for junior bankers in most cases in 2024, alongside an existing “pencils down” window from 6 p.m. Friday to noon Saturday and one full weekend off every three months. Live deals are exempt. In March 2026 the bank began piloting weekly reports that compare juniors’ self-reported hours with electronic activity such as keystrokes, video calls and meetings. The bank described the tool as being about awareness rather than enforcement.
  • Bank of America already had an 80-hour cap on paper, but it was reportedly often ignored. From fall 2024 it required U.S. junior bankers to log their hours daily, along with the deals they were on and the senior bankers overseeing them, and asked them to report pressure to underreport.
  • Goldman Sachs has a “Saturday rule”: juniors are not expected in the office from 9 p.m. Friday to 9 a.m. Sunday, and management says it monitors staffing and adjusts workloads.
  • Wells Fargo has team leads monitor hours weekly, reassigns work during busy periods and protects time from Friday evening to midday Saturday, plus holiday weekends.
  • Morgan Stanley says it monitors excess workflow and updates its approach over time.

Read that list closely and you will notice two things. First, the rules cluster around the same ideas: a weekly ceiling, a protected Friday-night window and some form of tracking. Second, almost every policy carries an exception for live deals, which is exactly when hours spike.

Why Policies and Reality Diverge

Surveys suggest the averages have not moved much. One 2025 survey cited in coverage of a recent Centerview employment case found first- and second-year analysts still averaging about 78 hours a week, unchanged from 2022, with elite boutiques slightly higher at about 82. Court filings in that case described analysts on active deals working 60 to 120 hours a week. The case settled in February 2026, and the bank said the claims had no merit.

None of that means the policies are empty. It means the cap is a ceiling for normal weeks, and normal weeks are not what wear people down. Four things decide your actual hours far more than the written rule:

  • Staffing ratios. How many analysts and associates support each VP and MD. A group that is one analyst short runs hot no matter what the policy says, and many groups are running lean while deal activity is high.
  • Deal mix. Sell-side processes, public M&A and live financings are hour-heavy and deadline-driven. Pitch-heavy coverage groups carry a different kind of load: more volume, less predictability. Restructuring has its own rhythm.
  • Group leadership. The same bank can have a group where the MD protects weekends and one where every Friday turns into a Sunday-night turn of the book. Policy is set at the top. Culture is set by whoever runs your team.
  • The live-deal exemption. If most of a group’s work is live execution, most of its hours fall under the exception. What matters is how often the exemption is used, not whether it exists.

What Changes by Level

Analysts feel the gap between policy and reality most directly. They do the work that expands to fill the time: model turns, page flips, diligence trackers. Tracking tools help most here, if the data actually leads to staffing changes.

Associates sit in the middle. They carry their own workload and manage the analysts’ workload, which means they often absorb the hours that a cap pushes off an analyst’s timesheet. If a group is enforcing analyst caps strictly without adding headcount, ask who picks up the slack. It is often the associate.

VPs inherit the staffing problem. When a team is thin, the VP is the one rebuilding the model at midnight or explaining to the MD why a deadline will slip. Lateral VPs should ask about team depth as hard as they ask about deal flow, because a strong pipeline with a weak bench is a long year.

Directors and MDs are not covered by junior hours policies, but they are judged on how their teams hold up. For senior laterals, a group’s turnover and its record of keeping juniors is a fair proxy for how much rebuilding you will be doing in year one.

How It Differs by Platform

Bulge brackets have the most formal machinery: written caps, central tracking and HR oversight. That structure is real protection, especially for juniors, but it can also create a gap between what gets logged and what gets worked. Large banks also have more groups, which means more variation from one team to the next.

Elite boutiques tend to run leaner teams on large, complex advisory mandates. The work is often excellent, and the hours can be heavier, as the survey figures above suggest. Policies tend to be less formal and depend more on the partners running each team.

Middle-market firms often give juniors broader roles across more deals, with smaller teams and less specialization. Hours can be more predictable, or less, depending on how many processes a team runs at once. Here more than anywhere, the person you will work for matters more than the firm’s name.

The Questions to Ask, and When to Ask Them

Most candidates avoid asking about hours because they worry it signals they don’t want to work. That worry is reasonable in a first-round interview. It is much less of a concern once you have an offer, and that is when the questions matter most. Framed well, they read as diligence, not reluctance.

  • “How is the team staffed today, and is that the steady state?” You want the number of analysts and associates per senior banker, and whether any seats are open.
  • “What does a typical month look like between live deals and pitching?” The mix tells you how often the live-deal exemption will apply.
  • “How have the people who joined the group a few years ago progressed?” It is a natural question about career paths, and it tells you about tenure and turnover without putting anyone on the spot. If many of them are still there or have been promoted, that says more about workload and culture than any brochure.
  • “What happened the last time someone was over the cap?” This asks whether the policy has consequences without asking anyone to admit a violation.

Then check what you hear. Talk to someone who sat in the group in the past couple of years, ideally someone who has since left and has no reason to sell it. Ask your recruiter what they hear from candidates who have interviewed or worked there. Good recruiters hear the same stories again and again, and patterns in those stories are often more reliable than any single conversation.

Weighing Workload Alongside Pay and Title

In a strong market, the conversation tends to center on compensation and title. Those matter, and a strong bonus year makes timing important (we covered that in our bonus season preview). But two offers with similar pay can mean very different lives, and very different career outcomes, depending on the team.

A heavier group is not automatically the wrong choice. If it brings better deal experience, closer senior sponsorship and a stronger platform for the next move, the hours could be worth it. The point is to choose it knowingly. A candidate who understands the workload going in tends to stay, perform and get promoted. A candidate who is surprised by it tends to start looking within a year, often before they have built the deal record that makes the next move work.

When you negotiate, keep the asks realistic. Banks will not write a custom hours guarantee into an offer letter, and asking for one can undercut you. What you can do is use what you learn to choose between offers, to ask sensible questions about team structure and start date, and to go in with clear eyes. Our guide on if, when and how to negotiate an offer covers which terms actually move.

What It Means for Your Career

Hours policies are a real improvement, and the tracking tools banks now use could make them more meaningful over time. But the written rule is the floor of your diligence, not the end of it. Staffing, deal mix, leadership and the live-deal exemption decide what you will actually work, and every one of those can be learned before you sign.

The bankers who build the best careers are rarely the ones who found the lightest job. They are the ones who picked the right team on purpose, knew what it would ask of them and stayed long enough to build a record. In a year with this many offers on the table, that choice is worth a few extra phone calls.

Related Reading

Sources

Related posts:

  1. Rolling Layoffs and Talent Upgrades: Are RIFs a Thing of the Past? Banks are still cutting jobs in a record M&A market, but mostly through quiet performance-based exits, promotion gates and attrition instead of announced RIFs, which lets them upgrade talent more cheaply and out of the headlines while the stigma of the cut lands on the individual....
  2. What a Below-Market Bonus Does to Your Next Move in Investment Banking Explore what a below-market bonus means for your career in investment banking and its impact on your next move in the industry....
  3. The Middle-Market Squeeze: What a Megadeal Market Means for Bankers on the Outside ...
  4. The Exit Everyone Overlooks: Why Your Next Move Might Be Another Bank Learn about the challenges and opportunities for post-MBA exit opportunities from investment banking in your career journey....
Share This